Copyright © 2019 JIANGYIN JUNZHUO MACHINERY MANUFACTURING CO., LTD All Rights Reserved. Site MapDesigned by iwonder.cn
Comparison between Dry Granulators and Wet Granulators
Dry granulators and wet granulators are two popular granulation technologies. Their main difference lies in whether a liquid binder is used—a fundamental distinction that leads to comprehensive variations in processes, equipment, applications, advantages, and disadvantages. Below is a detailed comparison:
I. Core Principle Comparison
Characteristic | Dry Granulator | Wet Granulator |
Core Principle | Physical compression | Liquid bridging (binder-mediated adhesion) |
Process | Powder → Roll-compressed dense sheets → Mechanical crushing into granules | Powder + Binder → Mixing & moistening → Extrusion/stirring into wet granules → Drying into dry granules |
Binder Requirement | No liquid binder needed; relies on intermolecular forces and mechanical interlocking | Liquid binders (e.g., water, ethanol, starch paste) are mandatory |
II. Process Flow & Equipment Comparison
Characteristic | Dry Granulator | Wet Granulator |
Typical Process | 1. Feeding 2. Roll compression 3. Crushing & granulation (No drying required) | 1. Mixing raw materials & excipients 2. Adding binder & wet mixing 3. Granulation (oscillating/high-shear) 4. Drying (fluid bed/oven) 5. Secondary granulation (for uniformity) |
Equipment Composition | Integrated single machine: Feeding system + Roll compression system + Crushing & granulation system | Equipment combination: Mixer + Granulator + Dryer + Secondary granulator |
Space Requirement | Compact; completed by one machine | Distributed; requires multiple devices, occupying larger floor space |
III. Advantages Comparison
Characteristic | Dry Granulator | Wet Granulator |
Process Time | Extremely short (minutes-level), continuous production, high efficiency | Long (hours-level, especially drying time), batch production |
Energy Consumption | Very low; no drying step, significant energy savings | High; drying is the main energy consumer |
Suitable Materials | Moisture- or heat-sensitive materials (e.g., antibiotics, vitamins) | Common materials stable to moisture and heat |
Safety & Environmental Friendliness | No solvent residue risk, no explosion risk, environmentally friendly | Risks of solvent safety, residue, and need for solvent recovery |
Material Yield | High; minimal material loss | Relatively low; loss occurs during transfer, wall adhesion, and drying |
IV. Disadvantages & Limitations Comparison
Characteristic | Dry Granulator | Wet Granulator |
Equipment Cost | High initial investment; high maintenance cost | Relatively low initial investment |
Process Development | More complex; extremely sensitive to raw material properties (fluidity, compressibility) | Relatively simple and mature; easier to master |
Granule Properties | Granules are hard and dense (may affect tablet disintegration); irregular shape | Granules are looser and porous; cylindrical shape; better compressibility |
Flexibility | Suitable for large-batch production of single formulas; complex cleaning for material changeovers | High flexibility; easy formula changeovers; suitable for multi-variety, small-batch production |
V. Selection Guide: When to Choose Dry vs. Wet Granulation?
Choose a Dry Granulator if:
Your raw materials are moisture- or heat-sensitive (decompose in water or are unstable at high temperatures).
You need high production efficiency and low energy consumption for continuous manufacturing.
You pursue high material yield, especially for expensive raw materials (minimizing loss is critical).
You need to avoid any risk of solvent residue.
Your raw materials already have good compressibility and fluidity (no need for binders to improve properties).
Choose a Wet Granulator if:
Your raw materials are stable to moisture and heat (the most common scenario).
You need to handle multiple formulas with frequent product changeovers
Your budget is limited, and you want to reduce initial equipment investment.
You require granules with superior morphology and compressibility.
Your process team has more experience with wet granulation, and the technology is more mature in your workflow.
Summary Analogy
Dry granulation is like a "road roller": It compacts loose materials into dense sheets using high physical pressure, then crushes them to the required size. It is efficient and powerful but "picky" about material properties.
Wet granulation is like "kneading dough": It uses liquid (binder) to bond powder (like flour) into a cohesive mass, shapes it into "noodles" (wet granules), and finally dries them. It is versatile and flexible but involves more steps.
The final selection depends on a comprehensive assessment of product characteristics, production scale, quality requirements, and cost budgets. There is no absolute "better" option—only the most suitable one for your specific needs.
By continuing to use the site you agree to our privacy policy Terms and Conditions.